Saturday

Reality is not Real

Consider the possibilities of dark matter. Strange how something could be invisible and yet have a gravitational pull - or is it?

Remember the debate on Light being either an energy beam or a particle?

Now there's a new debate - whether matter is actually solid, or simply opposite energies reflecting light and opposing other energies - such as our own fingers, creating the feeling of sensation.

Science is delving into molecular make-up in a new way. Their theory is - if something can become nothing, then nothing can become something - or is that something never anything to begin with?

Maybe all of these somethings are actually just clusters of energy.

And all of the 'nothings' (like Spirits, God(s), and thoughts) are errant waves of these clusters.

Think about it - our brain is one big cluster of energy, and controls everything we see, do, and know. Our brain is literally tricking our bodies into perceiving solidity. Deja Vu is just a lapse in our left-brain to right-brain communications - a delay that causes us to experience it again. Another theory on Deja Vu relates to the mammilian brain perceiving it before it sends the information to our 'over brain' - the part that actually has the left and right hemispheres.

Whichever causes Deja Vu, these studies show us just how powerful our brain is in tricking us. But what the brain doesn't know, is that we can trick our brain too. The Law of Belief states that whatever we believe with conviction of emotion will become our reality. You may think this strange, but it truly is not that far-fetched. If our brain is made of energy, and the world is made of energy - couldn't we therefore spread the energy within our brain to the world?

In "What the BLEEP do we know?" they proove this theory. In a study shown in that movie, a thought can be implanted on water, and consistently change the 'picture' of the water depending on the thought.

Before Copernicus, we KNEW the Earth was the center of our universe. Before Columbus or Cortez, we KNEW there was only a finite amount of land. Before Voyager 2 we KNEW there were 8 planets. How is this any different?

Note: After online searching, no other credits can be found aside from "What the BLEEP to we know?" Had I found the studies, I would have credited them - so this article was taken from memory.

19 comments:

Miche said...

I knew you'd be 'in' on this one too =) Wish I could find my copy of that movie! Otherwise I'd be able to credit most of those studies I've noted... unfortunately I can't even remember the name of the Water guy...

Miche said...

How am I wrong? Instead of 'bashing' me why not try and constructively critisize or even correct me? Otherwise, consider yourself disregarded.

I do not take into consideration other views without evidence.

And to be honest, who DOES understand these things? Numerous PhD's in quantum physics made a video entitled, "What the BLEEP to we know" - if they don't even know, then who does?

All forms of science are still a practice. Even and especially esoteric ones.

If I have confused you - sorry. Count yourself against the 25 others that have understood me. That's the 17 online readers plus 8 offline readers.

Counter-productive? Really? So you say Capernicus shouldn't have thought about the makeup of our universe? If it hadn't been for him, we probably never would have sent out Voyager 2 and discovered that the Sumerians were right about Neptune and Uranus. Oh wait, the Sumerians shouldn't have documented the Universe either.

If thought is pointless, then so is life.

Thanks for your view though. For what it's worth.

Anonymous said...

all that from a high school drop out, ouch GED

Hiddenson said...

Interesting read, especially the brain excerpt, about reality, our perception of it, and our own lies about it for not fully willing to face it. We are certainly misled by our senses and emotions.

Somehow related, is the debate I'm conducting on my own blog, about Real Life vs Virtual Life, or how these two perceptions are just that, concepts. If you're interested, I'd be happy to hear your opinion here.

Miche said...

Wonderful that you have found me, Hiddenson =) Counting you as #18... By the way, I did leave a small comment on yours. A bit time restrained for the moment, but I will come back in time. Certainly an interesting blog of yours.

Miche said...

...and Anonymous, High School and education as a whole today is doing America's society absolutely no good whatsoever. Most High School graduates are all but illiterate.

Frankly, I'm surprised most them can spell their own name.

Anonymous said...

you must have a great job and be loaded due to your massive intelligence. after all there must be such wonderful fruits of your great skills and insightfulness

Miche said...

Was DaVinci rich? Nope.

This may be yet another case of being discovered after one's death.

What are you doing to change the world for the better?

Anonymous said...

you need serious mental treatment. i guess it helps to be self deluded on so many levels to counteract the own horrible failure you are

Miche said...

Well, I'd say that certainly answers my question.

Nothing.

Instead, you're working to bring down the world to an even less auspicious state.

My failure has yet to be ascertained. One only fails once one stops trying. Apparently, you are indeed the failure, and the one with delusions. The only readers here who continuously degrade this blog are doing so based on a personal vendetta - not the actual facts on hand. Indeed, those who have no personal vendetta, with the exception of one person who has only posted once, have done nothing but praise and contribute.

Perhaps one should open one's eyes to their own mental illnesses. Your self-sabotaging nature is being projected upon the rest of the world as you perceive it. Had you seeked counseling and actually listened to yourself as opposed to tricking the pshychologist into releasing you so that you could have me back, you would probably resemble a normal person right now.

Instead, you still live beneath the shelter of your parents, still too lazy and afraid to go out on your own.

Do us all a favor. Instead of hiding behind an anonymous stance and stating things without evidence, take a look at yourself, and take responsibility for your actions.

Anonymous said...

wishing to change the world so to speak in light of ones own perspective is a fine ideal and laughable at the same time. you want so bad for everyone to tell you how wise you are and beg for the insight of your advice. someone as you with a horrible track record and obvious in the gutter life and whatever type of job you work shows how blind and delisional.

i would adore to see you in a job interview, or any situation where the other individual knew about topics, while you bs your way through.

the comic value of you believing you are to be compaired in any fashion to DaVinci is great.

you can change the world, but you cant get your life out of the gutter

Miche said...

LOL! OMGs I can't believe you're still wasting your time on this.

Have I begged for anyone to tell me I'm wise? I laugh at the concept. I'm just getting my ideas out there so that others can perhaps read them. And how am I BSing when I'm backing everything that I've stated? If I cannot defend the notion, and somebody else can back their opposing view, then I concede to have been proven wrong. Nobody knows everything, and I certainly do not claim to be one of the contrary.

I did not compare myself to DaVinci, I only provided an example where one's ideas are not always immediately recognized for their worth.

My life in the gutter? Oh well. Then I've given myself up for the greater good. A small sacrifice.

Before you go on thinking I believe myself to be the one true answer, allow me to quote, of all people, myself:

"My point is, you're not the greatest thing in this world. Nothing is. There is no end-all, no one true answer to anything."

Anonymous said...

She does have magic powers, it's called hot linking graphics, ouch I told your secret!

Miche said...

...Pluto was undiscovered until that expedition, at least by modern science. The Sumerians knew of it 6,000 years ago, but their texts were largely ignored. They did not know anything of 'technology' as it stands today, yet their discoveries number significantly more than that. Note we did not know the makeup of Neptune or Uranus, while the Sumerians detailed it.

I do appreciate your thoughts, and thank you for coming back.

Currently I am reading everything that I can on the subject, and as ideas surface, I write them here. My concept lies in the avant-garde, in both subject and writing form.

You have proven your point, regarding those who hold even a small doubt will remain attached to the material. By no means am I a master to the contrary. Very few people have been able to attain any semblance of the abilities I speak of, most of them applying it to martial arts, but the evidence is still there. Also, it is true that the tight clusters of energy we perceive as solid cannot be passed through. The energy field is simply too strong. Much like two similarly polarized magnets cannot be placed together.

Indeed, we must eat and clothe ourselves in harsh conditions - however this is only due to the flighty nature of energy. If an item is not maintained and fed more energy, it will fade from existance.

My point merely is that all things are made of energy. This fact can be found in any quantum physics manual.

Anonymous said...

pseudolus that was great

Miche said...

Zecharia Sitchin's Genesis Revisited - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0380761599/102-2220870-2197723?v=glance

He covers the discoveries of the Sumerians in his novels.

I stand corrected on Pluto, but the Sumerians still knew about not only all of the planets, but their makeup, 6,000 years ago.

This blog is an attempt to open the mind of the general public, to encourage invention and creativity, to right the wrongs of today's society, to educate on societal plagues, to enlighten and broaden horizons. To encourage family values, creative play, and deep thought.

Hence, this debate, is exactly what I am going for. I've gotten you to think again.

This is my only goal.

Thank you so much for contributing. You have proven your point, whilst I have no further evidence. Congratulations =) I hope to see your side of the fence in the future, and frequently. Your point of view is definitely one worth defending. Thanks!

Miche said...

Thank you so much for double-checking my references. I would actually greatly appreciate it if you would continue this. You've been a very refreshing guest, on-topic and concise.

You've made me think, and as you can perhaps already derive, there is nothing I enjoy more.

I've certainly taken your suggestions to heart, and I will make it a point to read up on my authors - at the very least, it will eliminate clutter in my bookshelves.

Anonymous said...

it's amazing no one can go on live TV and speak backwards in a language they have no prior knowledge of or call fire down from heaven.

"I've gone beyond the truth, it's just another lie."

too many sides to the same story, but who knows when anyone will get the facts if ever right. facts have been contested on the most simpliest of matters.

Anything remotely close to the spiritual condition/experience of humanity is the same as arguing who would win in a fight Superman or Santa.

Subjective "truth" can never be proven. Too much of what we believe to be solid truth is actually subjective.

By the way Pseudolus is all right by me - Trisha, you are a totally different story. You're facts seem to be based on the latest Google search or what documentary was on cable this week.

Miche said...

Nicely put, however I think you might have missed a few of the things I've said.

I don't have cable television.

Most times I end up searching on Google because I can't remember a scientist's name in order to credit them. I know the study, I know when it was, I just can't remember the guy's name. Obviously since I cannot find the author or mind behind it, most cases I cannot 'read up' on my sources. Although not entirely new to the occult, I do not have the breadth of pseudolus.

He's been down more roads than I, so his footsteps are greatly appreciated, moreso now that he has a legitamate 'backup singer' so to speak.

Your rhetoric is interesting. I'd like to know who you are... and perhaps future discussion.